Reappraising AIDS Vol. 2, no. 1

VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, PAGE 3 REAPPREAISING AIDS NOVEMBER 1994 provide a reference for his claim that accidental needle-sticks had resulted in AIDS. Nor, faced with questions from Bialy, could Lowenstein explain why he had showed a slide with no basis in experimental reality - nor could he provide support for his claim that HIV replicates in and destroys T-cells. The Morning Panel The morning panel did not include critics of the HIVAIDS hypothesis. First was Jan Kuby, an immunologist at San Francisco State University. She talked about autoimmunity, T-cell activation, antigens, apoptosis, SCID mice, cytokines, Alzheimers, etc. She informed the audience, "98% of the T-cells are in lymphoid tissues, but most data is (sic] based on blood", and asserted: "The virus is infecting cells in the lymph nodes - massive amounts of virus are being produced there... even before we can see anything going on in the blood at all." The above statement is simply not true. The lymph nodes do collect viruses and viral debris - just as the lint filter in a clothes dryer collects lint - but if "massive amounts of virus" were being produced anywhere in the body, there would also be massive amounts of virus in the blood. Next came Michael Ascher, of the California State Department of Health Services, co-author, with Warren Winkelstein, of an article, "Does drug use cause AIDS?" (Nature, 11 March 1993). He ridiculed the nitrites KS connection. He contended that saying AZT causes AIDS diseases is like saying insulin causes diabetes, apparently unaware of Duesberg's extensive analysis of AZT's toxicities. Next came Robert Schmidt, a physician, who presented a multifactorial approach to diseases of the elderly. It was a thoughtful and interesting talk, but irrelevant to the central topic of the symposium. Peter Plumley The first afternoon speaker, Peter Plumley, spoke on "An actuarial analysis of the AIDS epidemic in the United States." His central thesis was that official AIDS statistics, and pronouncements of the Public Health Service, have greatly distorted and exaggerated the epidemic, resulting in unrealistic perceptions of the relative risk of various sexual acts. The excessive fear of AIDS has adversely affected the lives of many people. Kary Mullis Kary Mullis, the 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry addressed the enigma: Why is there no monograph which marshals all of the arguments in favor of the HIV-AIDS hypothesis? Mullis asked dozens of AIDS researchers to supply him with a reference for the assertion that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS. Some of them became angry, and others said he didn't need a reference, because "everyone knows that." Some suggested a totally inadequate CDC report. Finally, Luc Montagnier came to San Diego, and Mullis thought, "this guy will know." After the meeting I asked him, and he first mentioned the CDC report, and I said I had already looked at it. that it wasn't what I was looking for - that I wanted a scientific paper that would support the notion that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS, not the consensus of a bunch of people who'd already begun looking at it. He said, "Well, why don't you quote the SIV work?" And I said to myself, "Oh my god! There really isn't such a paper, there can't be, or he wouldn't have to refer... to a virus that might kill a monkey... to illustrate the probability that HIV is the cause of AIDS!" Harry Rubin Harry Rubin, Professor of Molecular Biology at Berkeley, spoke on "The rush to simplification of complex problems in biomedical science: Cancer and AIDS." Rubin described his pioneering work forty years ago on the Rous sarcoma virus: "The first virus identified and characterized as a retrovirus - the one that, at least until AIDS, was the one most studied and worked on." As viruses of this kind had been associated since 1910 with several types of leukemia in chickens, they were given the name, Avian Leukosis Virus. However, Rubin subsequently found that these leukemias could and would occur in the absence of the retroviruses. Further, among the chickens that were infected, whose every cell was infected and constantly producing virus, only 15% developed the leukosis. "In spite of these findings, these viruses are still called Leukemia or Leukosis viruses, as they have been for 85 years." Rubin then discussed cancer, concluding: "Cancer can only be understood at the level of the complex dynamics of cellular interaction with the aging process and other such considerations as diet, smoking, lifestyle, etc." The same basic process is at work in AIDS. "If there ever was a case of multifactorial disease occurrence, in my estimation, AIDS is the case." Bryan Ellison Bryan Ellison is a graduate student in molecular and cell biology in Berkeley. His talk,"Drug use does cause AIDS: A reappraisal of the San Francisco Men's Health Study," was a severe critique of the article by Michael Ascher, Warren Winkelstein, et al. The Ascher report claimed that AIDS and T-cell depletion occurred only in the men who were HIV-antibody-positive, and that drug use had no effect on either T-cell depletion over time or the development of AIDS. Ellison and his colleagues obtained the raw data, and found that Ascher et al. had seriously misreported the data: By ignoring huge gaps and striking selection biases in the database, Ascher et al. reached the unsupportable conclusions that HIV-positive and HIV-negative men used similar amounts of drugs and that levels of drug use were not related to the risk of developing AIDS. In contrast, we found that HIV-positive men used significantly more heavy drugs than did HIV-negatives, and that drug use was more highly correlated with AIDS-related diseases than was HIV. Ellison characterized the misreporting of data by Ascher and Winkelstein a "serious breach of scientific ethics," and called upon them to retract the paper. THE REFLECTOR The Group operates a news reflector on Internet. Address your e-mail to Professor Phillip E. Johnson at <[email protected]> This reflector is a source of relevant press on the HIV/AIDS issue as well as selected contributions of the membership. To be included on The Reflector's mailing list, please email Professor Johnson.

/ 4

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 1-4 Image - Page 3 Plain Text - Page 3

About this Item

Title
Reappraising AIDS Vol. 2, no. 1
Author
Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis
Canvas
Page 3
Publication
Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis
1994-11
Subject terms
newsletters
Item type:
newsletters

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.030
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0256.030/3

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0256.030

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Reappraising AIDS Vol. 2, no. 1." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.030. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 17, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.