Why There is Still an HIV Controversy
10 '93 01: 45PM ADARC F. 4 1 Why there is still an HIV controversy Charles A. Thomas, Jr,*, Kary B. Mullis*, Bryan J. Ellison**, and Phillip E. Johnson*** October 20, 1993 Most scientists and the general public have the impression that the cause of AIDS is known: AIDS is caused by a retrovirus called HIV, which infects and kills T-cells, and thus leads to an inevitably fatal immune deficiency after an asymptomatic period that averages more than 10 years. Reports from the summer 1993 AIDS Conference at the U.S. National Institutes of Health suggest that a strategic retreat from this simple position is in progress, however. In place of the simple theory that HIV destroys the immune system by infectihg and destroying its cells, researchers are now speculating that HIV somehow signals the immune system to self-destruct at some indeterminate time in the future, possibly even after the virus itself has departed from the body. As Dr. Anthony Fauci explained the new direction of research, "It's clear you need the virus at some point to kick off the pathological events, but even if you knocked off the virus early you could still have damage to the immune system [24]." Dr. Robert Gallo was quoted to the same effect: "The molecular mimicry in which HIV imitates components of the immune system sets events into motion that may be able to proceed in the absence of further whole virus [24]." In this formulation the HIV theory becomes virtually unfalsifiable, since even the total absence of HIV from the body no longer disproves the possibility that the virus may once have been present to program the immune system invisibly for destruction, If Drs. Gallo and Fauci and their followers can discover an indirect means by which [HIV causes not only immune system collapse with resultant opportunistic infections, but also a diverse collection of unrelated conditions like dementia and Kaposi's sarcoma, then they will deserve our congratulations. On the other hand, this retreat from the direct cell-killing theory comes almost ten years after the discovery of "the cause of AIDS" was announced to the world at a press conference with promises of an imminent vaccine. The critics have said all along that [HIV does not kill the cells it infects. Indeed, [HIV itself is cultured in vitro in the type of T-cells that it is said to kill, even though there is no immune system in the petri dish. In any case, HIV infects too few cells in the body to cause immune system collapse. It is time to 111111 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III II 5571095.0256.013
About this Item
- Title
- Why There is Still an HIV Controversy
- Author
- Thomas, Charles A, Jr. | Mullis, Kary B. | Ellison, Bryan J. | Johnson, Phillip E.
- Canvas
- Page 1 - Title Page
- Publication
- 1993-10-20
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Scientific Research > Duesberg AIDS Hypothesis Controversy > General
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.013
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0256.013/1
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0256.013
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Why There is Still an HIV Controversy." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.013. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2025.