[Letter to Colleagues from Peter Duesberg]

9 Alternatively, one could hold to the figure 20,000 per year and present the comparison on a yearly basis, but some transparent way of citing just how this number was obtained must be devised. Now finally, this reviewer is not happy with the quoted number of 10% of the adult population being considered "homosexual." First of all ref 57 is not the best one to use. The section of ref 57 that deals with this subject is Fay et al. in press, Science 239. Well it was finally published as Fay,RE, Turner,CF, Klassen,AD, and Gagnon, JH. Science 243, 338-348 (1989). These au's specifically state that the best numbers that they can come up with are "1.6 to 2.0% of US male population has had one or more male contacts within the previous year" (see Abstract and their Table 7). Is it realistic to classify as "homosexual" for purposes of the AIDS inquiry as anyone who has had any male:male contact? It would seem to this reviewer that at least one contact during the past year should provide the number for the denominator to the 20,000 AIDS cases. Presuming that the author's number of 80 million is correct (better check!) for the total adult male population, then replacing the 10% by the 2% number from Fay et al, we must reduce the 8 million to 1.6 million, thereby increasing the author's 0.25% to 1.25% This is still a very low number and apparently it has been stable over the past three years. Most homosexuals in the US (as defined) do not and will probably never get AIDS. This is not readily reconciled with a new sexually transmitted infectious agent, which HIV is postulated to be (13). This reviewer agrees with that statement. Now the author has a transitional problem: he has just built the case that most homosexuals will not get AIDS, and now he plans to talk about their additional risks. Clearly a transitional sentence is required; this reviewer suggests: While most homosexuals do not get AIDS diseases, some do, and they represent more than 59% of the cases (15, Table 3). Therefore it is reasonable to ask: "What other risks are homosexual males subject to?." p8 11 "Indeed, a study by the CDC from 1987 lists..." It would be smoother to say: "A 1987 study by the CDC lists numerous other categories of AIDS risks factors in a group of 359 homosexual-men from San Francisco (58)." p8 line 3-10 Here are some excellent observations that support the idea that this group consumed a pharmacy of. drugs and had been infected with about every venereal

/ 80

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 1-50 Image - Page 42 Plain Text - Page 42

About this Item

Title
[Letter to Colleagues from Peter Duesberg]
Author
Duesberg, Peter
Canvas
Page 42
Publication
1993-01-12
Subject terms
letters (correspondence)
Item type:
letters (correspondence)

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0256.009/42

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0256.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"[Letter to Colleagues from Peter Duesberg]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0256.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 17, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.

Downloading...

Download PDF Cancel