Report on the Global HIV/AIDS epidemic
Annotations Tools
Prevention: daunting challenges ahead health and social services to drug-using communities - suggest that the official figures underestimate the true rates of infection in this population. New data from clients contacted by outreach programmes for drug users in the Russian city of St Petersburg show that 12% of those tested are infected with HIV, whereas the rate is just 0.2% in registered drug users. In the Ukrainian city of Poltava, some 40% of clients of prevention projects are infected with HIV, compared with around 10% of registered drug users. While precise figures may be hard to come by, it is clear that HIV can explode through drug-using populations with remarkable speed and can stabilize at very high rates. For example, HIV infection among injecting drug users in various cities in the Ukraine rose from virtually zero in 1994 to 31-57% in less than two years. In 1999, there was a massive outbreak of HIV infection among injecting drug users in the Russian capital, Moscow, with over three times as many new cases of HIV reported in that year as in all previous years combined. HIV prevalence rates ranging between 30% and 70% have been found among injecting drug users in Argentina, Brazil, India, Spain, Thailand and the USA (Puerto Rico). Risk behaviour in these populations remains common. Recent studies in various cities have found that close to a third of injecting drug users in Brazil and two-thirds in Thailand regularly share injecting equipment, while in Argentina three-quarters of those surveyed said they had shared syringes at some time. Some countries - including several in central and eastern Europe - are recording a rise in the absolute number of injecting drug users, with a distressing fall in the age at which people start injecting drugs. In Slovakia, 2% of 15-16-year-olds said they had injected drugs. In St Petersburg, over 40% of drug users attending a treatment centre in 1999 were young people, up from just 13% two years earlier. In one study, some Thai girls said they started injecting before they turned 16, on average two years earlier than boys. Drug injection poses a threat of HIV infection not only to the individuals who engage in it but also to their sex partners. In the USA, it is estimated that 9 out of 10 cases of heterosexual transmission of HIV in New York City are related to sex with a drug user. In some places, including much of China and parts of India and Myanmar, more women are infected through sex with drug users than in any other way. Fully 83% of injecting drug users in Brazil's Rio de Janeiro said they did not use condoms with their regular partners, and 63% never used them even with casual partners. Injecting drug use also contributes to mother-to-child transmission of HIV. In Uruguay, 40% of babies with HIV are born to mothers who inject drugs. When injecting drug users sell sex to pay for drugs, the prospect of sexual transmission obviously looms large. But because both commercial sex and drug use are hidden, they are doubly hard to quantify. In studies of injecting drug users in Argentina (Buenos Aires), Brazil (Rio de Janeiro) and Canada, a third or more of respondents of both sexes said they had exchanged sex for drugs at least once. The overlap appears to increase the risk of infection. In a study among 212 male inject75 fa / " 4 AYu 11 r4/ //~ /
-
Scan #1
Page #1
-
Scan #2
Page #2
-
Scan #3
Page 1 - Title Page
-
Scan #4
Page 2
-
Scan #5
Page 3 - Table of Contents
-
Scan #6
Page 4 - Table of Contents
-
Scan #7
Page 5
-
Scan #8
Page 6
-
Scan #9
Page 7
-
Scan #10
Page 8
-
Scan #11
Page 9
-
Scan #12
Page 10
-
Scan #13
Page 11
-
Scan #14
Page 12
-
Scan #15
Page 13
-
Scan #16
Page 14
-
Scan #17
Page 15
-
Scan #18
Page 16
-
Scan #19
Page 17
-
Scan #20
Page 18
-
Scan #21
Page 19
-
Scan #22
Page 20
-
Scan #23
Page 21
-
Scan #24
Page 22
-
Scan #25
Page 23
-
Scan #26
Page #26
-
Scan #27
Page 24
-
Scan #28
Page 25
-
Scan #29
Page 26
-
Scan #30
Page 27
-
Scan #31
Page 28
-
Scan #32
Page 29
-
Scan #33
Page 30
-
Scan #34
Page 31
-
Scan #35
Page 32
-
Scan #36
Page 33
-
Scan #37
Page 34
-
Scan #38
Page 35
-
Scan #39
Page 36
-
Scan #40
Page 37
-
Scan #41
Page 38
-
Scan #42
Page 39
-
Scan #43
Page 40
-
Scan #44
Page 41
-
Scan #45
Page 42
-
Scan #46
Page 43
-
Scan #47
Page 44
-
Scan #48
Page 45
-
Scan #49
Page 46
-
Scan #50
Page 47
-
Scan #51
Page 48
-
Scan #52
Page 49
-
Scan #53
Page 50
-
Scan #54
Page 51
-
Scan #55
Page 52
-
Scan #56
Page 53
-
Scan #57
Page 54
-
Scan #58
Page 55
-
Scan #59
Page 56
-
Scan #60
Page 57
-
Scan #61
Page 58
-
Scan #62
Page 59
-
Scan #63
Page 60
-
Scan #64
Page 61
-
Scan #65
Page 62
-
Scan #66
Page 63
-
Scan #67
Page 64
-
Scan #68
Page 65
-
Scan #69
Page 66
-
Scan #70
Page 67
-
Scan #71
Page 68
-
Scan #72
Page 69
-
Scan #73
Page 70
-
Scan #74
Page 71
-
Scan #75
Page 72
-
Scan #76
Page 73
-
Scan #77
Page 74
-
Scan #78
Page 75
-
Scan #79
Page 76
-
Scan #80
Page 77
-
Scan #81
Page 78
-
Scan #82
Page 79
-
Scan #83
Page 80
-
Scan #84
Page 81
-
Scan #85
Page 82
-
Scan #86
Page 83
-
Scan #87
Page 84
-
Scan #88
Page 85
-
Scan #89
Page 86
-
Scan #90
Page 87
-
Scan #91
Page 88
-
Scan #92
Page 89
-
Scan #93
Page 90
-
Scan #94
Page 91
-
Scan #95
Page 92
-
Scan #96
Page 93
-
Scan #97
Page 94
-
Scan #98
Page 95
-
Scan #99
Page 96
-
Scan #100
Page 97
-
Scan #101
Page 98
-
Scan #102
Page 99
-
Scan #103
Page 100
-
Scan #104
Page 101
-
Scan #105
Page 102
-
Scan #106
Page 103
-
Scan #107
Page 104
-
Scan #108
Page 105
-
Scan #109
Page 106
-
Scan #110
Page 107
-
Scan #111
Page 108
-
Scan #112
Page 109
-
Scan #113
Page 110
-
Scan #114
Page 111
-
Scan #115
Page 112
-
Scan #116
Page 113
-
Scan #117
Page 114
-
Scan #118
Page 115
-
Scan #119
Page 116
-
Scan #120
Page 117
-
Scan #121
Page 118
-
Scan #122
Page 119
-
Scan #123
Page 120
-
Scan #124
Page 121
-
Scan #125
Page 122
-
Scan #126
Page 123
-
Scan #127
Page 124
-
Scan #128
Page 125
-
Scan #129
Page 126
-
Scan #130
Page 127
-
Scan #131
Page 128
-
Scan #132
Page 129
-
Scan #133
Page 130
-
Scan #134
Page 131
-
Scan #135
Page 132
-
Scan #136
Page 133
-
Scan #137
Page 134
-
Scan #138
Page 135
-
Scan #139
Page 136
-
Scan #140
Page 137
-
Scan #141
Page 138
-
Scan #142
Page 139
-
Scan #143
Page #143
-
Scan #144
Page #144
-
Scan #145
Page #145
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Report on the Global HIV/AIDS epidemic
- Author
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
- Canvas
- Page 75
- Publication
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
- 2000-06
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Chronological Files > 2000 > Events > International Conference on AIDS (13th: 2000: Durban, South Africa) > Government materials
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0160.029
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0160.029/78
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0160.029
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Report on the Global HIV/AIDS epidemic." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0160.029. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 11, 2025.