Abstracts Vol. 1 [International Conference on AIDS (11th: 1996: Vancouver, Canada)]

Monday, July 8, 1996 Mo.D.580 - Mo.D.600 recognized as a full member of the French social space.They pointed out the fragility of young gays towards the transmission of HIV. Clouzeau Fabrice, Sida Info Service, 190 bd de Chdronne 75020 PARIS, France. Tel:l -44931626 Fax: 1-44931649 Mo.D.580 THE AIDS COMMUNITY DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS (ACDP):A SUCCESSFUL MULTI-SITE COMMUNITY-LEVEL BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION Fishbein, Martin, Johnson, W.D. AIDS Community Demonstration Projects, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Objective: To evaluate a theory based, community-level intervention designed to increase consistent condom and bleach use among populations at high risk for HIV infection (i.e., injecting drug users [IDU], female sex partners of IDU, commercial sex-workers, men who have sex with men but who do not gay identify and street youth) in five U.S. cities. Methods: Small media intervention materials (e.g., pamphlets, community newsletters) were developed for each specific population.These materials, distributed in intervention communities by community volunteers, contained role-model stories focusing on key theoretical behavior change variables as well as condoms and bleach kits. A series of ten cross-sectional surveys (2 pre and 8 post intervention) were performed in each of ten intervention and matched comparison community/risk group pairs. Progress toward consistent condom use and consistent bleach use (to sterilize injection equipment) was measured on five-place (I -no intention to use; 5=consistent use > 6 months) Stage of Change scales. Condom carrying and exposure to the intervention were also measured. Results: Linear regression and logistic analyses (Ns range from 4235 to 12346) were used to test for a time by treatment (intervention vs comparison) interaction effect, as well as for a main effect of exposure (vs. nonexposure) to ACDP materials or personnel. After controlling for Age, Gender, Ethnicity Risk Group and City significant interactions indicating greater increases in intervention than comparison areas were found with respect to condom use with non main partners (p<.0001), bleach use (p<.05), and condom carrying (p<.0001I). There was a similar, but non-significant effect with respect to condom use with main partners (p=.0888). Furthermore respondents reporting ACDP exposure averaged higher on the Stage of Change scale for all target risk-reduction behaviors, and were more likely to possess a condom at the interview, than unexposed intervention area respondents. Conclusions: Theory based, community-level interventions can significantly increase HIV risk-reduction behaviors in historically underserved populations. M. Fishbein, BIRB, DSTD, CDC, MS E-44, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA Telephone: 404-639-8299 Fax:404-639-8622 email:[email protected] Mo.D.581I COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION REDUCES HIV RISK AMONG YOUNG GAY MEN: A TWO COMMUNITY STUDY Kegeles Susan M, Hays R, Pol lack L, CoatesT Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, USA. Objective: To evaluate an 8-month peer led community-level HIV prevention program for young gay/bisexual men that we developed and implemented in 2 mid-sized U.S. communities. Methods: The intervention, based on diffusion of innovations theory used 5 elements designed to increase support for safer sex and to change community norms: I) a young gay men's community center we created, 2) a core group of young men who ran the project, 3) informal outreach conducted among friends, 4) formal outreach conducted at gay venues and social events we produced, 5) small groups which focused on safer sex and informal outreach in the context of more salient issues to young gay/bi men. Independent of the intervention, we recruited a longitudinal cohort of gay/bi men aged I 8-27 in the communities and resurveyed them annually twice prior to the intervention, and twice post-intervention (Baseline I N = 242 combined from the communities). Data from the communities were combined to increase statistical power since we found no significant differences between the communities on risk behavior, demographics, and psychosexual variables. Results: Boyfriend analyses include only men with boyfriends. Percent of Men Reporting Unprotected Anal Intercourse In the Past 2 Months leaders as peer educators. A study project modelled on the approach was initiated among the student body of Lund University (37,000 students) in 199 I. Methods: The evaluation consisted of yearly focus group discussions with student organisa tion and opinion leaders, anonymous questionnaire mail surveys in 1992, 1993 and 1995, impact questionnaires at main HIV STD testing sites and qualitative interviews with student community leaders, project peer educators and regular students. Results:The surveys revealed the preoject had reached 50% of students in 1 99 Iand 70% in both 1993 and 95. In all 3 surveys, respondents indicated project prevention messages to be more personally relevant than those of central campaigns Reported consistent condom use with new sex partners was significantly higher among project-contacted students than non-contacted in 1992, 1993 and 1995 (62% vs. 47%).This was even the case for reported condom use during the last intercourse with a new sex partner" in the I1995 survey (72% vs. 58%). Bivariate comparison of the 1992 and 95 surveys revealed statistically significant increases in consistent condom use, perceived safer sex social norms, subjective knowledge and internal locus of control. Also found were decreases in between-partner communication barriers and in the percentage of students with a STD history Implementations found to have the greatest impact on these variables were those involving direct peer educatorto-student contacts and student to student communication (diffusion).The project began as a cooperative action between local health clinics and the leaders of 25 student organisations. In 1994 it was registered as a non-profit student organisation with an elected board of directors representing these organisations. Conclusions: The findings suggest that a HIV prevention approach based on community action and organisation is feasible under the conditions of this study and may facilitate the creation of prevention messages that are both relevant and culturally adapted to a target group. Further, it could suggest that when actual implementations are designed and execut ed by opinion leaders, they may effect condom use via a modification of normative, social and self-efficacy perceptions. Gary R. Svenson, Dept. of Community Medicine, Malmo University Hospital, -5 20502 Malmo, Sweden.Telephone: +46-40-331000; Fax: +46-40-336215 Mo.D.583 THE WOMEN'S SAFER SEX HIERARCHY: INITIAL RESPONSES TO COUNSELING ON WOMEN'S METHODS OF STD/HIV PREVENTION AT AN STD CLINIC Gollub, Erica L.*, French, P**, Latka, M.* Johns, L.* Blum, L.* O'Donnell J.* Stein Z.A.***. *Phila. Dept. of Publi Health; **Medical College of PA., Pennsylvania, USA; ***Columbia Univ., NY, NY, USA. Objective: To measure differences in risk of reinfection with STD and unwanted pregnancy in a clinical trial of three different counseling messages: full choice ("hierarchy") of women's barrier methods (female condom, diaphragm, spermicides, etc.); enhanced male condom counseling only, and female condom counseling only. Methods: More than 1 600 STD clinic attendees have been randomized to receive 3 different counseling messages since May 1995. F ollowing counseling all anonymously rated the intervention and answered knowledge questions based on the specific counseling received. As of Jan I, 1996, 233 women have also enrolled in an intensive follow up (FU) cohort for acceptability data. 2-week FU behavioral data on sexual risk were compared with intake data. In addition, choices of the 119 in the hierarchy FU group were tabulated and were evaluated for relationships to previous method use. Results: Scored from I (highest) to 5 (lowest), mean responses ranged flrom. I to 1.9 for rating of counselor, video and group discussion/interactive educational approach in the clin ic. Among women counseled on the hierarchy of women's protective options. 74% understood the nature of hierarchical risk following counseling. Among the subset of 119, 87% chose the female condom, 63% male condom, 6 1% spermicidal foam, 57% spermicidal film, 33% spermicidal suppository I I% diaphragm, and 6% cervical cap (choices non-exclusive). The reduction in number of unprotected acts of intercourse at 2 wks by self report was greatest in the hierarchy arm, as compared with female condom and male condom arms: 83%, 54% and 39%, respectively Male condom users at intake tended to supplement con dom use rather than replace it with other methods. Enrollment for the female condom is significantly easier than for the male condom. Conclusions: Initial results from this large STD clinic-based intervention suggest that a video + group discussion design is well-liked. Furthermore, the hierarchical message appears to be understood by a majority and the methods are used for risk reduction in the 2-wk FU period.When exposed to the hierarchy. male condom users tend to supplement rather than substitute use of other methods.The female condom and other female barriers are viable risk-reduction options at an STD clinic. Long-term acceptability and effectiveness will be determined over subsequent FU's (up to I year). E.L. Gollub, Philadelphia Dept. of Public Health/AIDS Activities Coordinating Office, 500 South Broad St., 2nd Floor, Phila. PA I 9 146 Telephone: 2 I 5-685-6560 Fax 2 I 5 685-67 I 4 email: 102027. [email protected] Mo.D.600 HIV/AIDS INTERVENTION AMONG TRANSSEXUALS IN BANGALORE. MEDICO - LEGAL IMPEDIMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION Saniay.. Samraksha - Bangalore,India (Ngo - Hiv/Aids Intervention/Prevention Project. Objective: To provide HIV/AIDS information/counselling/STD treatment and condom distribution among transsexuals in, Bangalore - INDIA. Methods: In Bangalore there are 7 families comprising of approximately 25 transsexuals each, they are a very closely knit community After making the initial contact each group was educated on HIV/AIDS.They have 10 times the number of clients compared to sex work ers; Majority of homosexuals also visited them.They are at a much higher risk fiom HIV They are distributed with condoms, and also treated for STDs. Results: Evaluation of the transsexuals HIV programme after a year showed; a) 80 % con dom usage among the community and the need for stronger condoms. b) A remarkable decrease in STDs. Difficulties/Drawbacks:The transsexual population have no STD treatment facilities, they do not have access even to the Government STD clinics.They have to take treatment from quacks thus persistent STDs.They have no legal status due to lack of voting rights, nor can they make any complaints to the police if exploited.The condoms supplied lack the aecessary strength and lubrication thus greater number of breakage during sexual contact. They O in 0 U Oc <( C O 0 a) cO a) CU cc 0 me cc a) c 5 52 BaselineI with casual partners 21% with boyfnend 54% Baseline 2 2-months Post intervention 12-months Post-intervention 19%5 13%* 10%* 57% 42%* 50% *p<.05, differences between post-intervention assessment and Baseline 2 There were no significant differences between levels of unprotected anal sex at the 2 baselines, indicating no naturally occurring trends towards risk reduction. We found a 32% relative reduction in unsafe sex with casual partners and a 26% relative reduction in unsafe sex with boyfriends from Baseline 2 levels at the 2-month post-intervention assessment.The reduction in unsafe sex with casual partners was sustained one year post-intervention, but there was a return to unsafe sex with boyfriends (many of which were new relationships). Attrition does not appear to bias the results. Conclusions: Mobilizing young gay men to encourage each other about the need for safer sex and creating a center at which support can be expressed is an effective approach to HIV prevention with young gay/bisexual men, but programs need to be sustained over time,. Additional efforts particularly need to focus on risk reduction among boyfriends. SM Kegeles, 74 New Montgomery #600, San Francisco, CA 94 105 USATeI: 415-597-9 I 59; Fax: 415-597-92 I 3; email: [email protected] Mo.D.582 INCREASED CONSISTENT CONDOM USE AMONG STUDENTS IN A PREVENTION STUDY BASED ON COMMUNITY ORGANISATION AND ACTION AND THE USE OF PEER EDUCATORS. Swvenson, Gary R,**, Johnsson K***, Hanson BS*. *Dept. of Community Medicine, Lund University; Malm; **Dept of Infectious Diseases, Univ. Hosp of Lund, Lund; ***Student Health Clinic, Lund University Lund, Sweden Objective: To develop and longitudinally evaluate a HIV STD prevention approach based on community organisation and action, target group empowerment and the use of opinion

/ 516
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 41-90 Image - Page 52 Plain Text - Page 52

About this Item

Title
Abstracts Vol. 1 [International Conference on AIDS (11th: 1996: Vancouver, Canada)]
Author
International AIDS Society
Canvas
Page 52
Publication
1996
Subject terms
abstracts (summaries)
Item type:
abstracts (summaries)

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0110.046
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0110.046/62

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0110.046

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Abstracts Vol. 1 [International Conference on AIDS (11th: 1996: Vancouver, Canada)]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0110.046. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 11, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.

Downloading...

Download PDF Cancel