Final Program and Oral Abstracts [International Conference on AIDS (8th: 1992: Amsterdam, Netherlands)]
Annotations Tools
THURSDAY, 23 JULY 1992 ThB 1508-ThB 1513 Th 1508 ANONYMOUS QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS Ih 15?08 CONSUMPTION OF PRESCRIBED AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICATION AND PATTERNS OF RECREATIONAL DRUG USE IN A HIV POSITIVE POPULATION Valentine. Christopher B: Weston, R; Kitchen,V; Main, J; Moncrieff, KC* and Aber, VR* St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, LONDON W2 and *MRC HIV CTC, LONDON, UK. Objectives: To establish patterns of usage of prescribed medication, alternative medication consumption, the beliefs of our patients surrounding these agents and patterns of recreational drug use. Methods: All patients attending our HIV clinic during a representative 2 week period were asked to complete an anonymous self-administered questionnaire The data which was analysed by SAS and BMDP statistical software. Results: Ninety-nine patients returned the questionnaire.(response rate 82%). 93% of the respondents were gay or bisexual men. The mean age was 36 with a range of 21-67. The patients were taking an average of 3 (range 0-10) medications prescribed by the clinic. Only 8% reported getting prescribed medications from any other source (their general practitioner). No patient reported obtaining medications on the "black market". 53% were taking other or alternative medications the most commonly used of which was vitamins with 60% reporting that they are or have been taking vitamins in the past. The patients generally felt that drugs prescribed from the clinic were helping them; only 4 patients feeling that these medications were harming or not helping them. Most patients did not feel that alternative medications are better than prescribed medicines and 12% did not feel they complemented prescribed medicines. Alternative medications are perceived to be safe. In the three months prior to the survey, only one patient reported that he did not drink alcohol, 68% of the respondents reported drinking alcohol at least twice a week, 62% smoke cigarettes every day and only 24% are non-smokers. 78% used 'poppers', 46% cocaine, 48% ecstasy and 78% cannabis. Other recreational drugs were taken. Conclusions: Patients receive a large number of drugs from the clinic which they generally perceive to be helping. They also take alternative medicines which are perceived to be safe but not better than conventional medicines. Recreational drug use is common. Valentine, Christopher B, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Norfolk Place, Paddington, LONDON W2, United Kingdom. Tel: 071 725 6666, Fax 071 724 7349 ThB 1510 UTILITY OF HIV-1 P24 ANITGEN MEASUREMENT IN CSF FROM PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT. Royal. Walter III. Concha M, McArthur JC, Selnes OA, Nance-Sproson TE, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Objective: To determine the relationship between CSF measurements of HIV-1 p24 antigen (p24Ag) in samples from HIV-1 seropositive individuals and the presence of HIV-related dementia. Methods: Blood (plasma or serum) and CSF samples were assayed for p24Ag in antigen capture EIA following treatment in acidic buffer (Coulter, Hialeah, Fl.). The frequency of antigen detection was compared for individuals with no cognitive impairment (NL), cognitive impairment with no evidence of dementia (NP+), and individuals diagnosed with HIV-related dementia (DM). Statistical analyses were performed using parametric and non-parametric tests where appropriate. Results: P24Ag assays were performed on 84 blood and 72 CSF samples from 65 individuals. Peripheral blood median CD4+ cell counts were 561.5, 300.5, and 190.0 per mm3 for the NL, NP+, and DM group, respectively (p<0.001). In blood p24Ag was positive among 32/41 (78%) NL, 18/27 (67%) NP+, and 14/16 (88%) DM samples (NS). In CSF 2/26 (8%) NL, 3/37 (8%) NP+, and 9/23 (39%) DM samples were positive for p24Ag (p= 0.002). Among samples from DM subjects the sensitivity of the p24Ag assay in CSF was, therefore, 39%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 64%, negative predictive value 81%, and the efficiency 78%. Conclusions. HIV-1 p24Ag can be detected in the CSF of individuals with HIV dementia using acid-treated samples in this antigen capture assay. The high specificity and negative predictive values for this assay suggest that this test is useful in the diagnosis of dementia related to HIV-1 infection. ThB 1509 CCOGNITIVE DEFICIT & NEUROLOGICAL T 1 5 9 IMPAIRMENT IN PEDIATRIC HIV Stein. Zena,* ** Mellins CA,* Levenson Jr., RL,* Zawadzki R,* Kairam R.***. * HIV Center for Clinical & Behavioral Studies, NYS Psych. Inst., New York, NY, USA; ** Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; *** St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY, USA Objective: To explore the potential contribution to cognitive functioning oft HIV infection, neurological impairment, and pre-natal drug-exposure. Method: 49 children who were HIV-exposed and between the ages of 2.5 and 8.5 years received neurological (standard clinical examination) and psychological (McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities) assessments in a pediatric neurology clinic. Eight children were seroreverters, all neurologically normal, 29 children were HIV-infected with no neurological impairment, and 12 children were HIV-infected with neurological deficits. All eight of the seroreverters, and 22 of the 41 HIV+ children, were pre-natally drug exposed. Results: The mean level of cognitive functioning for this sample was in the Borderline range, with 39% of the sample scoring in the Mentally Retarded range. There were no differences in cognitive functioning between Seroreverters and HIV+ children who did not yet have neurological deficits. However, HIV+ children with neurological impairment scored considerably below the other two groups on the General Cognitive Index, and the Quantitative and Memory Scales (Means in the Mentally Retarded range). No differences could be attributed directly to drug-exposure. Discussion: There were no apparent differences in cognitive functioning associated with HIV status alone or drug exposure alone. Nevertheless, both HIV-infected and seroreverted children demonstrated significant cognitive deficits compared to national standards. However, the presence of neurological impairment in HIVinfected children markedly intensified these deficits. These results suggest that although drug exposure and cultural deprivation may result in decreased cognitive performance in children, regardless of HIV status, with the advent of neurological impairment, presumably HIV associated, children are at additional risk for functioning in the Mentally Retarded range. Zena Stein, M.A., M.B., B.Ch. NYS Psych. Inst., Box 53, 722 West 168 Street New York, NY 10032, USA Phone 212-928-5103 Fax 212-795-5886 Th B 1 511 QUINOLNIC ACID AND THE PATHOGENESIS OF AIDS DEMENTIA. Brew. Bruce ames*. Corbeil J*., Pemberton L*, Heyes M**, Evans L*, Penny R* and Cooper DA*. Centre for Immunology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia, **National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA Objectives: Quinolinic acid (QUIN), an excitotoxin acting through the N Methyl D Aspartate receptor, has been found to be markedly elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with AIDS dementia complex (ADC), raising the possibility of its importance in the pathogenesis of ADC. The cellular origin of QUIN and its relationship to HIV-1 infection and cytokines are unknown but at least one cytokine, gamma interferon, can "switch on" the first enzyme in QUIN synthesis. We tested the hypothesis that HIV infected and activated macrophages could produce QUIN. Methods: Human macrophages were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and grown in serum-free conditions. The production of QUIN by resting macrophages was compared with the production by macrophages infected with various strains of HIV-1 including those from patients with severe ADC. To substantiate that QUIN was produced by the kynurenine pathway, [13C6]-tryptophan was added to the media and assay for [13C6]-QUIN was undertaken by gas chromotography-mass spectrometry. Next, macrophages were activated by gamma interferon and QUIN assayed. Lastly, two populations of macrophages were infected one with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the other with human herpes virus type 6 (HHV-6). Supernatants for QUIN analysis were taken at 24, 36,48 and 60 hours. Results: Resting macrophages did not produce QUIN. HIV-1 infected macrophages produced up to 20,000 nM of QUIN and there was no significant difference in QUIN production by HIV-1 isolated from patients with ADC versus those without [13C6]-QUIN was detected in the supernatants from macrophages that had had [13C6]-tryptophan added to the medium. Gamma interferon activated macrophages produced concentrations of QUIN similar to those infected with HIV-1. QUIN production by HHV-6 infected macrophages peaked at 900 nM and CMV infected macrophages had negligible production. Conclusions: QUIN is produced by macrophages that have been infected by HIV-1, by macrophages activated by gamma interferon andby macrophages infected with HHV-6. There is, however, differential production with the highest levels resulting from infection with HIV-1 and gamma interferon activation. HIV-1 infected macrophages produce QUIN in concentrations that are far in excess of the known several hundred-fold nanomolar neurotoxic concentrations. The mechanism at least in part is probably related to gamma interferon production by inflammatory cells. These results further support a role for QUIN in the pathogenesis of AIDS dementia complex. Dr. Walter Royal, III, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer 6-119, 600 North Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205 USA; Tel: 410-955-3950, Fax: 410-955-0672 Bruce Jrres Brew, Centre for Inmunology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria Street, Sydney NSW 2010. Phone: 61 2 332 4648 Fax: 61 2 332 1837 ThB 1 512 Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: Disease Progression, Stabilization and Response to Intrathecal ARA-C in 26 Patients. Britton, C.B., Romagnoli, M., Sisti, M., Powers, J.M. Columbia University, New York, New York. U.S.A. We evaluated twenty-six patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and HIV infection. Thirteen patients were treated with intrathecal cytosine arabinoside (ara-C). Patient Characteristics and Treatment Criteria: Twenty-five men and one woman were referred for evaluation of possible PML over a four year period. Twenty-thee men were homosexual, two heterosexual, one a former parenteral drug user and the other, hemophiliac. The woman had a history of non-parenteral drug use. The age range was 30 to 65, mean 43. In twenty-one patients, the diagnosis of PML was confirmed by brain biopsy, including all thirteen patients treated with ara-C. The criteria for intrathecal ara-C treatment were clinical and radiographic evidence of disease progression despite maximal tolerated anti-retroviral therapy with AZT or ddl. Patient Outcome: Three patient groups were analyzed: I. Rapid Disease Progression: Of four men in this category, two met criteria for AIDS because of recent PCP. PML was confirmed by biopsy in three. CT and MRI showed unifocal disease in 3, multifocal in 1. Mean CD4 count was 50, range 16 to 92. All were taking AZT. Duration of illness to death was 4 to 5 months. II. Disease Stabilization: Of nine patients in this category, one met criteria for AIDS because of recent PCP and another had systemic tuberculosis two years prior. In seven patients, PML was the AIDS defining illness. PML was confirmed by biopsy in five patients. CT and/or MRI showed multifocal disease in 4, unifocal in 5. Mean CD4 count was 238, range 30 to 800. Two patients stabilized without treatment, five on AZT and two when changed to ddI. III. Cytosine Arabinoside Treatment: Of thirteen treated patients (12 men and 1 woman), nine met criteria for AIDIS because of PCP or KS and in four, PML was the AIDS defining illness. All received the drug intrathecally. Mean CD4 count was 106, range 7 to 690, less than 50 in ten patients. Eight patients stabilized and improved, four for 7 months to 2 years; and four for 6 weeks to 6 months. Non-responders had large lesion size, major deficits or brainstem disease. Survival times were greater in ara-C responders. Conclusion: PML may stabilize in patients with CD4 counts > 200, either spontaneously or with anti-retroviral treatment. Those with AZT-resistance may stabilize on ddl even with CD4 counts of 50 to 100. Disease progression is most likely with CD4 counts <50, even with anti-retroviral treatment. An ara-C treated group, most of whom had CD4 <50, had a 60 % response rate, sustained in half up to 2 years, transient in half up to 6 months. Carolyn B. Britton, M.D. Phone: (212) 305-5220 710 W. 168th Street New York, NY 10032 USA Fax: (212) 305-4578 New York, NY 10032 USA ThB 1513 COMPARISON OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC S 1PERFORMANCE BETWEEN AIDS-FREE IV DRUG USERS AND OMOSEXUAL MEN. Concha., Mauricio, Selnes OA, Royal W, Updike M, NanceSproson T, Vlahov D, Palenicek J, McArthur JC. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD USA Objective: To compare the neuropsychologic performance between AIDS-free IV drug users and homosexual/bisexual men according to HIV serostatus and CD4* count. Methods: Baseline neuropsychologic performance of 107 IV drug users and 230 homosexual/bisexual men was compared. Tests measured attention, memory, and psychomotor speed. Using multiple regression modeling, the analysis adjusted for age, IQ score, race, six month history of alcohol use, cocaine, opiates and arijuana. Subjects were stratified as seronegatives or seropositives with CD4' cells a350 or <350/mm3. Results: Among IV drug users and homosexual men the mean age (SD) was 34.8 (6.1) and 37.2 (7.2), median IQ score 83 and 109.5, and 102/107 (95.3%) and 42/230 (18.3%) were non-white, respectively. IV drug users showed significantly poorer scores in all tests in the univariate analysis. However, once adjusted for age, IQ and race only Symbol Digit remained significant, and the Rey Complex Figure and Grooved Pegboard tests borderline significant. IQ score was highly associated with performance in all tests (p<0.001), except Grooved Pegboard (0.01<p<0.05). Except for Rey Complex Figure-copy and Digit Span, higher age was associated with worse performance on all tests (p<0.001). No significant interactions were observed between risk group and the three strata. Conclusions: These data indicate that age and IQ rather than risk group account primarily for the differences in neuropsychologic performance, regardless of serostatus and CD4~ count. Additionally, adjustment of neuropsychologic scores by IQ may be a better correction for premorbid differences than years of education. Dr. Mauricio Concha, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer 6-181, 600 N. Wolfe St. Baltimore, MD 21205 USA, tel: 410-955-3730; fax: 410 -955-0672 Th67
-
Scan #1
Page #1 - Front Matter
-
Scan #2
Page #2 - Front Matter
-
Scan #3
Page 1
-
Scan #4
Page 2
-
Scan #5
Page 3 - Title Page
-
Scan #6
Page 4
-
Scan #7
Page 5
-
Scan #8
Page 6 - Table of Contents
-
Scan #9
Page 7
-
Scan #10
Page 8
-
Scan #11
Page 9
-
Scan #12
Page 10
-
Scan #13
Page 11
-
Scan #14
Page 12
-
Scan #15
Page 13
-
Scan #16
Page 14
-
Scan #17
Page 15
-
Scan #18
Page 16
-
Scan #19
Page 17
-
Scan #20
Page 18
-
Scan #21
Page 19
-
Scan #22
Page 20
-
Scan #23
Page 21
-
Scan #24
Page 22
-
Scan #25
Page 23
-
Scan #26
Page 24
-
Scan #27
Page 25
-
Scan #28
Page 26
-
Scan #29
Page 27
-
Scan #30
Page 28
-
Scan #31
Page 29
-
Scan #32
Page 30
-
Scan #33
Page 31
-
Scan #34
Page 32
-
Scan #35
Page 33
-
Scan #36
Page 34
-
Scan #37
Page 35
-
Scan #38
Page 36
-
Scan #39
Page 37
-
Scan #40
Page 38
-
Scan #41
Page 39
-
Scan #42
Page 40
-
Scan #43
Page 41
-
Scan #44
Page 42
-
Scan #45
Page 43
-
Scan #46
Page 44
-
Scan #47
Page 45
-
Scan #48
Page 46
-
Scan #49
Page 47
-
Scan #50
Page 48
-
Scan #51
Page 49
-
Scan #52
Page 50
-
Scan #53
Page 51
-
Scan #54
Page 52
-
Scan #55
Page 53
-
Scan #56
Page 54
-
Scan #57
Page 55
-
Scan #58
Page 56
-
Scan #59
Page 57
-
Scan #60
Page 58
-
Scan #61
Page 59
-
Scan #62
Page 60
-
Scan #63
Page 61
-
Scan #64
Page 62
-
Scan #65
Page 63
-
Scan #66
Page 64
-
Scan #67
Page 65
-
Scan #68
Page 66
-
Scan #69
Page 67
-
Scan #70
Page 68
-
Scan #71
Page 69
-
Scan #72
Page 70
-
Scan #73
Page 71
-
Scan #74
Page 72
-
Scan #75
Page 73
-
Scan #76
Page 74
-
Scan #77
Page 75
-
Scan #78
Page 76
-
Scan #79
Page 77
-
Scan #80
Page 78
-
Scan #81
Page 79
-
Scan #82
Page 80
-
Scan #83
Page 81
-
Scan #84
Page 82
-
Scan #85
Page 83
-
Scan #86
Page 84
-
Scan #87
Page 85
-
Scan #88
Page 86
-
Scan #89
Page 87
-
Scan #90
Page 88
-
Scan #91
Page 89
-
Scan #92
Page 90
-
Scan #93
Page 91
-
Scan #94
Page 92
-
Scan #95
Page 93
-
Scan #96
Page 94
-
Scan #97
Page 95
-
Scan #98
Page 96
-
Scan #99
Page 97
-
Scan #100
Page 98
-
Scan #101
Page 99
-
Scan #102
Page 100
-
Scan #103
Page 101
-
Scan #104
Page 102
-
Scan #105
Page 103
-
Scan #106
Page 104
-
Scan #107
Page 105
-
Scan #108
Page 106
-
Scan #109
Page 107
-
Scan #110
Page 108
-
Scan #111
Page 109
-
Scan #112
Page 110
-
Scan #113
Page 111
-
Scan #114
Page 112
-
Scan #115
Page 113
-
Scan #116
Page 114
-
Scan #117
Page 115
-
Scan #118
Page 116
-
Scan #119
Page 117
-
Scan #120
Page 118
-
Scan #121
Page 119
-
Scan #122
Page 120
-
Scan #123
Page 121
-
Scan #124
Page 122
-
Scan #125
Page 123
-
Scan #126
Page 124
-
Scan #127
Page 125
-
Scan #128
Page 126
-
Scan #129
Page 127
-
Scan #130
Page 128
-
Scan #131
Page 129
-
Scan #132
Page 130
-
Scan #133
Page 131
-
Scan #134
Page 132
-
Scan #135
Page 133
-
Scan #136
Page 134
-
Scan #137
Page 135
-
Scan #138
Page 136
-
Scan #139
Page 137
-
Scan #140
Page 138
-
Scan #141
Page 139
-
Scan #142
Page 140
-
Scan #143
Page 141
-
Scan #144
Page 142
-
Scan #145
Page 143
-
Scan #146
Page 144
-
Scan #147
Page 145
-
Scan #148
Page 146
-
Scan #149
Page 147
-
Scan #150
Page 148
-
Scan #151
Page 149
-
Scan #152
Page 150
-
Scan #153
Page 151
-
Scan #154
Page 152
-
Scan #155
Page 153
-
Scan #156
Page 154
-
Scan #157
Page 155
-
Scan #158
Page 156
-
Scan #159
Page 157
-
Scan #160
Page 158
-
Scan #161
Page 159
-
Scan #162
Page 160
-
Scan #163
Page 161
-
Scan #164
Page 162
-
Scan #165
Page 163
-
Scan #166
Page 164
-
Scan #167
Page 165
-
Scan #168
Page 166
-
Scan #169
Page 167
-
Scan #170
Page 168
-
Scan #171
Page 169
-
Scan #172
Page 170
-
Scan #173
Page 171
-
Scan #174
Page 172
-
Scan #175
Page 173
-
Scan #176
Page 174
-
Scan #177
Page 175
-
Scan #178
Page 176
-
Scan #179
Page 177
-
Scan #180
Page 178
-
Scan #181
Page 179
-
Scan #182
Page 180
-
Scan #183
Page 181
-
Scan #184
Page 182
-
Scan #185
Page 183
-
Scan #186
Page 184
-
Scan #187
Page 185
-
Scan #188
Page 186
-
Scan #189
Page 187
-
Scan #190
Page 188
-
Scan #191
Page 189
-
Scan #192
Page 190
-
Scan #193
Page 191
-
Scan #194
Page 192
-
Scan #195
Page 193
-
Scan #196
Page 194
-
Scan #197
Page 195
-
Scan #198
Page 196
-
Scan #199
Page 197
-
Scan #200
Page 198
-
Scan #201
Page 199
-
Scan #202
Page 200
-
Scan #203
Page 201
-
Scan #204
Page 202
-
Scan #205
Page 203
-
Scan #206
Page 204
-
Scan #207
Page 205
-
Scan #208
Page 206
-
Scan #209
Page 207
-
Scan #210
Page 208
-
Scan #211
Page 209
-
Scan #212
Page 210
-
Scan #213
Page 211
-
Scan #214
Page 212
-
Scan #215
Page 213
-
Scan #216
Page 214
-
Scan #217
Page 215
-
Scan #218
Page 216
-
Scan #219
Page 217
-
Scan #220
Page 218
-
Scan #221
Page 219
-
Scan #222
Page 220
-
Scan #223
Page 221
-
Scan #224
Page 222
-
Scan #225
Page 223
-
Scan #226
Page 224
-
Scan #227
Page 225
-
Scan #228
Page 226
-
Scan #229
Page 227
-
Scan #230
Page 228
-
Scan #231
Page 229
-
Scan #232
Page 230
-
Scan #233
Page 231
-
Scan #234
Page 232
-
Scan #235
Page 233
-
Scan #236
Page 234
-
Scan #237
Page 235
-
Scan #238
Page 236
-
Scan #239
Page 237
-
Scan #240
Page 238
-
Scan #241
Page 239
-
Scan #242
Page 240
-
Scan #243
Page 241
-
Scan #244
Page 242
-
Scan #245
Page 243
-
Scan #246
Page 244
-
Scan #247
Page 245
-
Scan #248
Page 246
-
Scan #249
Page 247
-
Scan #250
Page #250
-
Scan #251
Page 1
-
Scan #252
Page 2
-
Scan #253
Page 3
-
Scan #254
Page 4
-
Scan #255
Page 5
-
Scan #256
Page 6
-
Scan #257
Page 7
-
Scan #258
Page 8
-
Scan #259
Page 9
-
Scan #260
Page 10
-
Scan #261
Page 11
-
Scan #262
Page 12
-
Scan #263
Page 13
-
Scan #264
Page 14
-
Scan #265
Page 15
-
Scan #266
Page 16
-
Scan #267
Page 17
-
Scan #268
Page 18
-
Scan #269
Page 19
-
Scan #270
Page 20
-
Scan #271
Page 21
-
Scan #272
Page 22
-
Scan #273
Page 23
-
Scan #274
Page 24
-
Scan #275
Page 25
-
Scan #276
Page 26
-
Scan #277
Page 27
-
Scan #278
Page 28
-
Scan #279
Page 29
-
Scan #280
Page 30
-
Scan #281
Page 31
-
Scan #282
Page 32
-
Scan #283
Page 33
-
Scan #284
Page 34
-
Scan #285
Page 35
-
Scan #286
Page 36
-
Scan #287
Page 37
-
Scan #288
Page 38
-
Scan #289
Page 39
-
Scan #290
Page 40
-
Scan #291
Page 41
-
Scan #292
Page 42
-
Scan #293
Page 43
-
Scan #294
Page 44
-
Scan #295
Page 45
-
Scan #296
Page 46
-
Scan #297
Page 47
-
Scan #298
Page 48
-
Scan #299
Page 49
-
Scan #300
Page 50
-
Scan #301
Page 51
-
Scan #302
Page 52
-
Scan #303
Page 53
-
Scan #304
Page 54
-
Scan #305
Page 55
-
Scan #306
Page 56
-
Scan #307
Page 57
-
Scan #308
Page 58
-
Scan #309
Page 59
-
Scan #310
Page 60
-
Scan #311
Page 61
-
Scan #312
Page 62
-
Scan #313
Page 63
-
Scan #314
Page 64
-
Scan #315
Page 65
-
Scan #316
Page 66
-
Scan #317
Page 67
-
Scan #318
Page 68
-
Scan #319
Page 69
-
Scan #320
Page 70
-
Scan #321
Page 71
-
Scan #322
Page 72
-
Scan #323
Page 73
-
Scan #324
Page 74
-
Scan #325
Page 75
-
Scan #326
Page 76
-
Scan #327
Page 77
-
Scan #328
Page 78
-
Scan #329
Page 79
-
Scan #330
Page 80
-
Scan #331
Page 81
-
Scan #332
Page 82
-
Scan #333
Page 83
-
Scan #334
Page 84
-
Scan #335
Page 85
-
Scan #336
Page 86
-
Scan #337
Page 87 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #338
Page 88 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #339
Page 89 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #340
Page 90 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #341
Page 91 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #342
Page 92 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #343
Page 93 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #344
Page 94 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #345
Page 95 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #346
Page 96 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #347
Page 97 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #348
Page 98 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #349
Page 99 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #350
Page 100 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #351
Page 101 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #352
Page 102 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #353
Page 103 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #354
Page 104 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #355
Page 105 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #356
Page 106 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #357
Page 107 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #358
Page 108 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #359
Page 109 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #360
Page 110 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #361
Page 111 - Comprehensive Index
-
Scan #362
Page #362
-
Scan #363
Page #363
-
Scan #364
Page #364
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Final Program and Oral Abstracts [International Conference on AIDS (8th: 1992: Amsterdam, Netherlands)]
- Author
- International AIDS Society
- Canvas
- Page 67
- Publication
- CONGREX Holland B.V.
- 1992-06
- Subject terms
- programs
- Series/Folder Title
- Chronological Files > 1992 > Events > International Conference on AIDS (8th: 1992: Amsterdam, Netherlands) > Conference-issued Documents
- Item type:
- programs
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0050.028
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0050.028/317
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0050.028
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Final Program and Oral Abstracts [International Conference on AIDS (8th: 1992: Amsterdam, Netherlands)]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0050.028. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2025.