Reports on HIV/AIDS: 1990

JUNE 8, 1990, MMWR, Vol. 39, No. 22, pp.380-383 TABLE 1. Sample panels used to evaluate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot (WB) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody - Model Performance Evaluation Program, May 1988 and August 1989* 1988t 19891 Positive' Negative' Positive' Negative' HIV-1 test samples samples Total samples samples Total EIA 18 8 26 19 8 27 WB 18 7 25 6 7 13 *Includes 752 U.S. laboratories that returned complete results in both May 1988 and August 1989. tin May 1988, 53 coded plasma samples were tested by 25 reference and 727 participating laboratories. Reference laboratories were selected because of extensive experience and excellent long-term performance in proficiency testing programs. 5In August 1989, 28 coded plasma samples were tested by 28 reference and 724 participating laboratories. Three participating laboratories in 1988 were reference laboratories in 1989. 'Seroreactivity of samples sent to laboratories was defined (positive or negative) on the basis of 1) agreement on reactivity to HIV-1 antibody by at least 90% of the reference laboratories, 2) agreement with reactivity to HIV-1 antibody as determined by testing at CDC using licensed WB kits and using Public Health Service-endorsed interpretive criteria (3), 3) no diluted samples except pooled samples of identical HIV-1-antibody reactivity, and 4) availability of additional information on the specimen source. Samples that met these inclusion criteria were likely to be typical of most samples tested routinely for HIV-1 antibody. TABLE 2. Performance measures of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot (WB) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody - Model Performance Evaluation Program, May 1988 and August 1989 Change (from Performance measure 1988 (%) 1989 (%) 1988 to 1989 (%) EIA Analytic sensitivity* 99.7 99.3 -0.4 Analytic specificityt 98.5 99.7 +1.2 Overall analytic performance' 99.3 99.4 +0.1 WB Analytic sensitivity* 99.3 98.9 -0.4 Analytic specificityt 91.6 97.8 +6.8 Overall analytic performance5 97.8 98.4 +0.6 *Analytic sensitivity is the proportion of reactive test results in positive specimens. For calculating analytic sensitivity, WB "indeterminate" test results are combined with nonreactive test results. tAnalytic specificity is the proportion of nonreactive test results in negative specimens. For calculating analytic specificity, WB "indeterminate" test results are combined with reactive test results. 'Overall analytic performance is the proportion of "correct" test results in all specimens tested. 70

/ 200
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 45-94 Image - Page 70 Plain Text - Page 70

About this Item

Title
Reports on HIV/AIDS: 1990
Author
United States. Dept. of Health and Human Services
Canvas
Page 70
Publication
United States. Dept. of Health and Human Services
1991-08
Subject terms
reports
Item type:
reports

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0036.011
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0036.011/76

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0036.011

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Reports on HIV/AIDS: 1990." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0036.011. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 5, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.

Downloading...

Download PDF Cancel