in Goddis office fro þat þat Crist bad his preestis do. So, ȝif apostlis weren now alyve, and sawen þus preestis serve in þe Chirche, þei wolden not clepe hem Cristis officeris, but officeris of Anticrist. Suppose we þat þes newe ordris, stondinge alle þes olde ordris, ben chargious to þe Chirche in worldli goodis þat þei dispenden. For noumbre of preestis brouȝt in bi Crist was sufficient for Cristis hous, and for þe same hous ben now moo and worse; and þis hous is lesse by hem. Who mai denye þat ne þis noumbre of þes officeris is now to myche? And so þis stiward haþ chargid þis hous wiþ newe rehetours [Several explanations have been proposed of this word, the general sense of which clearly is 'servants,' 'menials.' But since rehete and re∣hetinge, in the sense of 'refresh,' are of frequent occurrence in Chaucer, the proposal of Dr. Todd to con∣sider rehetours a noun of the agent formed from rehete, and to derive it from the old French word rehaiter, rehetier, seems to me preferable to the ingenious solutions proposed by writers in 'Notes and Queries.' Hait meant enjoyment, haiter to enjoy one∣self; therefore rehetours might mean lazy apolaustic fellows, idlers, super∣numeraries with little or no work to do,—a class which in those days of 'maintenance' infested, as we know, the great country houses and castles of the nobility. See Todd's Three Treatises by Wycliffe. Dublin, 1857.] , to harm of it. And siþ Poul techiþ in bileve, þat þei shulden not be chargious to þe Chirche, and þat þei have no power but to profite, not to harme, it semeþ bi good resoun þat þis stiward passiþ his power, and failiþ in governaunce of þe Chirche, aȝen þe reule þat Crist haþ tauȝt; and so he is not Cristis stiward, but stiward of Anticrist. What man can not se þat a stiward of an erþely lord, [þat] [supplied conjecturally.] whanne many servauntis done amys, holdiþ stille, and bryngiþ in newe þat done werse bi litil tyme, failiþ foule in his office? And so servauntis upon servantis weren charious to þis hous; and ȝif þer firste office was good, and þis is now al oþer, þe changynge of þes newe rehetours shulde do harm to þis hous. And þus it stondiþ in þe Chirche of þes newe servauntis þat ben brouȝt in.
And newe lawes ben maad to hem, and newe customes þat [The clergy are ever absorbing more wealth, and more land.] þei bryngen in, by whiche þei spuylen on newe þe puple, but fruyt of þer profit failiþ. And siþ Petre hadde not þis power, ne Poul, ne ony oþir apostle, þis stiward of Anticrist mut nede come in bi þe fend. O! siþ in þe olde lawe weren preestis and