Accessibility & Publishing

References

• Accessibility Rules for Publishers. (2017, June 26). Retrieved March 19, 2018, from https://www.ontario.ca/page/accessibility-rules-publishers
• Accessible Books Consortium. (n.d.). Accessible Publishing. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from http://www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/publishing/en/
• Accessible Publishing Working Group. (2016). BISG Quick Start Guide to Accessible Publishing. New York: Book Industry Study Group.
• AccessText. (2017). AccessText Network. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://www.accesstext.org/index.php/
• Adler, P. S. (2015). Special Issue on Copyright. Research Library Issues: A Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC (285), 1–2. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.29242/rli.285
• AHEAD. (2006). Position Statement: AHEAD’s Perspective on the Issues of Textbook Access. AIM: The Advisory Commission on Accessible Instructional Materials in Postsecondary Education for Students with Disabilities. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/aim/meeting/4-1-2001-teleconference/ahead-position-paper.doc
• Alkhateeb, F., Abu Doush, I., & Albsoul, A. (2017). Arabic optical character recognition software: A review. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 27(4), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1134/S105466181704006X
• American Library Association. (2004, June 29). Core values of librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/corevalues
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 328 (1990).
• Association of Research Libraries. (2012). Briefing: Accessibility, the Chafee Amendment, and Fair Use. Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/fair-use/code-of-best-practices/2445-briefing-accessibility-the-chafee-amendment-and-fair-use#.WqaC8JPwaAw
• Association of Research Libraries. (n.d.). Access to Federally Funded Research. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/public-access-policies/federally-funded-research#.WvhhD9MvyAx
• Baer, D. J. H. The Authors Guild, Inc., et al., against HathiTrust, et al. (United States District Court, Southern District of New York, October 10, 2012). Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/files/hathitrust_decision_copy_2.pdf
• Baker-Young, M. (2017, December 18). Fulcrum Year End Update - 2017 Edition. Retrieved February 19, 2018, from https://www.fulcrum.org/blog/2017/12/18/year-end-update/
• Band, J. (2013a, August 6). The Marrakesh Treaty. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from http://policynotes.arl.org/?p=92
• Band, J. (2013b, October 10). A User Guide to the Marrakesh Treaty. Library Copyright Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/storage/documents/user-guide-marrakesh-treaty-1013final.pdf
• Band, J. (2015). What Does the HathiTrust Decision Mean for Libraries? Research Library Issues: A Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC (285), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.29242/rli.285
• Big Ten Academic Alliance. (2018). Library E-Resource Accessibility - Testing. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from https://www.btaa.org/library/accessibility/library-e-resource-accessibility—testing
• Blumenstein, L. (2010). Kindle Accessibility Suit Settled with Universities. Library Journal, 18.
• Bookshare. (n.d.). Bookshare. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.bookshare.org/cms/
• Bowes, F. (2018). An Overview of Content Accessibility Issues Experienced by Educational Publishers: A Current Overview of Content Accessibility. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1145
• Brault, M. W. (2012). Americans with Disabilities: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
• Bromley, M. J. (2017, November 2). Guidelines for Creating Accessible Digital Materials for Blind Students. Portland State University. Retrieved from https://www.ahead.org/about-ahead/about-overview/special-interest-groups/blind-and-low-vision
• Butler, B. (2015). Fair Use Rising: Full-Text Access and Repurposing in Recent Case Law. Research Library Issues: A Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC (285), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.29242/rli.285
• Candela, A. C. (2009). Bookshare. In S. Burch (Ed.), Encyclopedia of American Disability History (pp. 124–125). New York: Facts on File.
• CENDI. (n.d.). Implementation of Public Access Programs in Federal Agencies. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from https://cendi.gov/projects/Public_Access_Plans_US_Fed_Agencies.html
• Centivany, A. L. (2016). Understanding Organizational Responses to Innovative Deviance: A Case Study of HathiTrust (Dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
• Centivany, Alissa. (2017). The Dark History of HathiTrust. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science.
• Columbia University Libraries. (2016, November 18). Public Access Mandates for federally Funded Research. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from https://scholcomm.columbia.edu/open-access/public-access-mandates-for-federally-funded-research/
• Coolidge, A., Doner, S., & Robertson, T. (2015). B.C. Open Textbook Accessibility Toolkit. British Columbia: BCcampus. Retrieved from http://opentextbc.ca/accessibilitytoolkit/
• Copyright Law of the United States, 17 U.S.C. § 101. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html
• Cox, K. (2015). International Copyright Developments: From the Marrakesh Treaty to Trade Agreements. Research Library Issues: A Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC (285), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.29242/rli.285
• DAISY Consortium. (2018). Accessible Publishing Knowledge Base. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from http://kb.daisy.org/publishing/
• Dallas, B. K., & Upton, T. D. (2011). Maximizing Access to Postsecondary Educational Print Materials for Students with Print-Related Disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 42(1), 35–42.
• Darnton, R. (1989). Toward a History of Reading. The Wilson Quarterly, 13(4), 86–102.
• de Bruijn, M., Castro, L., Kircz, J., Lorusso, S., Murtaugh, M., Rasch, M., … Wu, A. (2015). From Print to Ebooks: A Hybrid Publishing Toolkit for the Arts. Amsterdam: Institute of network cultures.
• DIAGRAM Center, & National Center for Accessible Media. (2014). Image Description Guidelines. Retrieved from http://diagramcenter.org/table-of-contents-2.html
• Disability Rights Advocates. (2015, November 19). National Federation of the Blind and Scribd Agree to Collaborate to Make Reading Subscription Service Accessible to the Blind. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from http://dralegal.org/press/national-federation-of-the-blind-and-scribd-agree-to-collaborate-to-make-reading-subscription-service-accessible-to-the-blind/
• Disability Rights Advocates. (2013, May 6). Settlement, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://dralegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/settlement-ucb_0.pdf
• Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund. (2012, October 10). National Association of the Deaf v. Netflix. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://dredf.org/captioning/
• E-book Audit 2016. (2016, November). Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://sites.google.com/site/ebookaudit2016/home
• EBSCO. (n.d.). Accessibility. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.ebsco.com/technology/accessibility
• Editorial Information. (2002). Currents: An E-Journal, (6). Retrieved from https://currents.dwrl.utexas.edu/spring02/index.html
• Fulcrum. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2018, from https://www.fulcrum.org/
• Garrish, M. (2012). Accessible EPUB 3. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=860821
• Global Library Survey Final Report. (2009). Rightscom Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.daisy.org/projects/global-accessible-library/survey_final_report.html#s1
• Goldberg, B. (2013). E-Reader Firms Fight Rules Requiring Accessibility. American Libraries, 44(11/12), 16.
• Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (2016). Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• Hansen, J. (2016). E-Reader. In The Social Media Revolution: An Economic Encyclopedia of Friending, Following, Texting, and Connecting. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
• HathiTrust. (n.d.). About. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from https://www.hathitrust.org/about
• Hilderley, S. (2011, April). Accessible Publishing Best Practice Guidelines for Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.accessiblebooksconsortium.org/inclusive_publishing/en/accessible_best_practice_guidelines_for_publishers.html
• Hoff, H. E. (2008). Kurzweil Reading Machine. In C. R. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470373699.speced1215
• Holdren, J. P. (2013, February 22). Memorandum on Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf
• Inclusive Design Research Centre. (n.d.). Floe Inclusive Learning Design Handbook. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://handbook.floeproject.org/
• International Digital Publishing Forum. (2017, January 5). EPUB Accessibility 1.0: Conformance and Discovery Requirements for EPUB Publications. Retrieved from http://www.idpf.org/epub/a11y/accessibility.html
• International Organization for Standardization. (2012). Information technology - W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (ISO/IEC 40500:2012). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/58625.html
• Johnson, S., Evensen, O. G., Gelfand, J., Lammers, G., & Zilper, N. (2012, January). Key Issues for e-Resource Collection Development: A Guide for Libraries. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collection-development/publications/electronic-resource-guide-2012.pdf
• Kasdorf, B. (2013). Key Issue - EPUB 3’s Coming of Age. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 26(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.06
• Kasdorf, B. (2018). Why Accessibility Is Hard and How to Make It Easier: Lessons from Publishers. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1146
• Kidd, A. (2014, March). How to Choose E-Books & E-Readers for Accessibility – 2014. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from http://atrc.colostate.edu/files/quickstarts/E-Books_E-Readers_Accessibility_3-2014.pdf
• Kumbier, A., & Starkey, J. (2016). Access Is Not Problem Solving: Disability Justice and Libraries. Library Trends, 64(3), 468–491.
• Learning Ally. (2018). Learning Ally. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://www.learningally.org/
• Lingane, A., & Fruchterman, J. (2003). The Chafee Amendment: Improving Access to Information. Information Technology and Disabilities, 9(1). Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A205363897/AONE?u=lom_umichanna&sid=AONE&xid=b3629966
• Linton, S. (1998). Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.
• McNaught, A., MacMullen, R., Smith, S., & Dobson, V. (2018). Evaluating E-book Platforms: Lessons from the E-book Accessibility Audit: Evaluating E-book Platforms. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1143
• Meekosha, H., & Soldatic, K. (2011). Human Rights and the Global South: The Case of Disability. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1383–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.614800
• Mills, M. (2015, January 5). Optophones and Musical Print. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://soundstudiesblog.com/2015/01/05/optophones-and-musical-print/
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of Education Statistics: 2013. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/
• National Institutes of Health. (2014, March 25). Frequently Asked Questions about the NIH Public Access Policy. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from https://publicaccess.nih.gov/FAQ.htm
• National Library Service. (2012). Report of the National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped 2012. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/nls/about/organization/reports-speeches/report-national-library-service-blind-physically-handicapped-2012/
• National Library Service. (n.d.). The National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.loc.gov/nls/about/
• OCLC. (2015). Meeting the E-resources Challenge: An OCLC Report on Effective Management, Access and Delivery of Electronic Collections.
• Office of Civil Rights. (1998, January 9). OCR Docket 09–97–2145 1998.
• Osgood, D. (2018, March 5). Taking Stock of the Key Changes to OCR’s New Case Processing Manual. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.hmbr.com/news-insight/taking-stock-of-the-key-changes-to-ocrs-new-case-processing-manual/
• Padilla, T., Allen, L., Varner, S., Potvin, S., Roke, E. R., & Frost, H. (2018). Always Already Computational. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://collectionsasdata.github.io/
• Pal, J., Chandra, P., O’Neill, T., Youngman, M., Jones, J., Song, J. H., … Ferrari, L. (2016). An Accessibility Infrastructure for the Global South (pp. 1–11). Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM Press. New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909666
• Pearson. (2017). Pearson Guidelines. Retrieved from http://wps.pearsoned.com/accessibility/
• Poe, T. ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017, Pub. L. No. H.R. 620 (2017). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/620
• ProQuest. (n.d.). ProQuest Accessibility. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.proquest.com/company/ProQuest-ADA-Compliance.html
• Puar, J. K. (2017). The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Queen, W. (2017, June 7). Update on Muse OPEN. Retrieved from https://t.e2ma.net/message/5h8egd/xz0il
• Risam, R. (2015, May 31). Across Two (Imperial) Cultures [blog]. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from http://roopikarisam.com/uncategorized/across-two-imperial-cultures-2/
• Rosen, S. (2017a). Describing Visual Resources Toolkit. Retrieved May 4, 2018, from https://describingvisualresources.org/
• Rosen, S. (2017b, February 3). Making Projects Accessible. [Blog post]. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/collaboratory/category/blog/
• Rothberg, M. (2018). Publishing with Accessibility Standards from the Inside Out: Accessibility Standards from the Inside Out. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1149
• Schantz, H. F. (1982). The History of OCR, Optical Character Recognition. Manchester Center, VT: Recognition Technologies Users Association.
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge.
• Slatin, J. M. (2001). The Art of ALT: Toward a More Accessible Web. Computers and Composition, 18(1), 73–81.
• Society for Disability Studies. (n.d.). Publishing Accessible Books. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from http://www.disstudies.org/Publishing%20Accessible%20Books
• Spina, C., & Cohen, M. (2018). SPEC Kit 358: Accessibility and Universal Design (May 2018). Association of Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.29242/spec.358
• Tatomir, J., & Durrance, J. C. (2010). Overcoming the Information Gap: Measuring the Accessibility of Library Databases to Adaptive Technology Users. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096240
• United Nations. (n.d.). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
• U.S. Department of Justice, & U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2010, January 19). Joint “Dear Colleague” Letter: Electronic Book Readers.
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Chisholm, W. A. (1998, January 20). Unified Web Site Accessibility Guidelines, Version 8. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/central.htm#REF.Ref
• W3C. (1999, May 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.w3.org/TR/WAinternetCONTENT/
• W3C. (2008, December 11). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
• W3C. (2018, June 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
• Waters, D. J. (2016, July 22). Monograph Publishing in the Digital Age. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://mellon.org/resources/shared-experiences-blog/monograph-publishing-digital-age/
• Wolfe, G. L., & Lee, C. (2007). Promising Practices for Providing Alternative Media to Postsecondary Students with Print Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(4), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00254.x
• World Blind Union. (n.d.). Marrakesh Treaty Ratification and Implementation Campaign. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from http://www.worldblindunion.org/English/our-work/our-priorities/Pages/right-2-read-campaign.aspx
• World Health Organization, & World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
• World Intellecutal Property Organization. (2016). The Marrakesh Treaty – Helping to End the Global Book Famine. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_marrakesh_overview.pdf
• Yadav, D., Sanchez-Cuadrado, S., & Morato, J. (2013). Optical Character Recognition for Hindi Language Using a Neural-Network Approach. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 9(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.2013.9.1.117