120 J. JOEL FARBER type that Patermouthis would need to keep, so we have to rely on the summary recorded in the concluding settlement, P.Miinch. 14 from 594 C.E. It is an unexplained oddity that loannes, though he seems to be present,35 does not actually sign this document, but is represented by a guarantor who answers for him. Was his illness chronic and is he now incapacitated? But he is still a soldier in the Syene &ptLe66. Was Patermouthis so disgusted with him that he refused to accept his brotherin-law's signature and demanded that a more responsible man vouch for him? In any event, we have here a detailed history of the progress of the dispute during the intervening nine years. It seems that loannes and Tapia had quarreled again and gone to arbitration about a house of hers. The arbitrator had ruled in favor of loannes, and as a result, she was supposed to pay him four solidi, but Patermouthis had gotten involved and somehow prevented her from paying her son. Ioannes then brought a complaint against Patermouthis before one Kallinikos, the deputy of another warden, and succeeded in having Patermouthis fined seven solidi for interfering in a matter that, he claimed, concerned only loannes and his mother. Evidently smarting from this fine, Patermouthis brought a suit against loannes for violating the written pledge he had signed in P.Miinch. 7 never to sue Patermouthis about the estate of Iakobos. But Patermouthis' suit was not tried: "after they had spoken and argued much with each other" they agreed to go to arbitration (lines 30-31). P.Minch. 14 records the results of that arbitration between the two men before a priest. Ioannes is to give Patermouthis five solidi on account of the seven solidi which Patermouthis had been fined by the warden's deputy. At the same time, loannes' claim on Tapia for the four solidi which the arbitration over the house had awarded him is retained, nullifying Patermouthis' attempt to prevent her from paying her son. A friendly resolution concludes the proceedings, according to which Patermouthis credits loannes with the four solidi that Tapia was supposed to give him, so that loannes now owes his brother-in-law only one solidus. We may well wonder if that solidus was ever paid. Franklin and Marshall College J. Joel Farber 35P.Munch. 14.42 and 51-52. 0
    Top of page Top of page