Poems / Ralph Waldo Emerson [electronic text]
About this Item
- Title
- Poems / Ralph Waldo Emerson [electronic text]
- Author
- Emerson, Ralph Waldo, 1803-1882
- Publication
- Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company
- 1904
- Rights/Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected], or if you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].
DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/BAD1982.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"Poems / Ralph Waldo Emerson [electronic text]." In the digital collection American Verse Project. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/BAD1982.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 25, 2025.
Pages
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Notes
-
* 1.1
THE PROBLEM. Page 6. This poem, one of the few that bear a date,—10 November, 1839,—is better known and more often quoted than any other which Mr. Emerson wrote. I: is also remarkable in this, that it would almost seem, like Athene, to have sprung matured and perfect from its author's brain. No fragments, no trials remain; much fewer verbal changes than is usual appear in the manuscript book of poetry, and not one since the poem saw light in the first number of the Dial in July, 1840. Mr. Emerson at first called it "The Priest." Here is the thought as recorded in the journal: —
"AUGUST 28, 1838. "It is very grateful to my feelings to go into a Roman Cathedral, yet I look as my countrymen do at the Roman priesthood. It is very grateful to me to go into an English Church and hear the liturgy read, yet nothing would induce me to be the English priest.
"I find an unpleasant dilemma in this, nearer home. I dislike to be a clergyman and refuse to be one. Yet how rich a music would be to me a holy clergyman in my town. It seems to me he cannot be a man, quite and whole; yet how plain is the need of one, and how high, yes, highest is the function. Here is division of labor that I like not: a man must sacrifice his manhood for the social good. Something is wrong; I see not what."
-
* 1.2
Page 6, note 1. The same thought occurs in the essay on Compensation ( Essays, First Series, p. 108), and this poem is another chapter on the Over-Soul.
-
* 1.3
Page 7, note 1. Journal, Florence, 1833.
"It is in the soul that architecture exists, and Santa Croce and the Duomo /are poor, far-behind imitations."
In the essays on Art ( Essays, First Series, and Society and Solitude) the inspiration, in its fullest sense, of the best works of man in Art and Architecture is taught.
-
* 1.4
Page 8, note 1. The gentle, serious and humane priest John of Antioch (347-407) was raised to the bishopric of Constantinople. Because of his Homilies (said to be the best in Christian literature) the name Chrysostom (Golden Mouth) was given him by the Ecumenical Council two hundred years after his death.
In sending to a friend the Confessions of Saint Augustine,
"translated two hundred years ago, in the golden time when all translations seemed to have the fire of original works,"
Mr. Emerson said,"I push this little antiquity toward you merely out of gratitude to some golden words I read in it last summer."
Of Taylor (1613-1667), the author of Holy Living and Holy Dying, Mr. Emerson said in an early journal: —
"'T is pity Jeremy Taylor could not always remember 'rien n'est beau que le vrai.' I have been reading the 'Contemplations of the State of Man.' An immense progress in natural and religious knowledge has been made since his death. Even his genius cannot quicken all that stark nonsense about the blessed and the damned. Yet in the' Life of Christ' I have thought him a Christian Plato; so rich and great was his philosophy. is it possible the intellect should be so inconsistent with itself? It is singular also that the bishop's morality should sometimes trip, as in his explanation of false witness."