Add to bookbag
Search this text:   Other search options
Author: Susanne Bobzien
Title: Higher-order Vagueness, Radical Unclarity, and Absolute Agnosticism
Publication Info: Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library
August 2010
Availability:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. Please contact mpub-help@umich.edu to use this work in a way not covered by the license.

Source: Higher-order Vagueness, Radical Unclarity, and Absolute Agnosticism
Susanne Bobzien


vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-30, August 2010
Abstract: The paper presents a new theory of higher-order vagueness. This theory is an improvement on current theories of vagueness in that it (i) describes the kind of borderline cases relevant to the Sorites paradox, (ii) retains the ‘robustness’ of vague predicates, (iii) introduces a notion of higher-order vagueness that is compositional, but (iv) avoids the paradoxes of higher-order vagueness. The theory’s central building-blocks: Borderlinehood is defined as radical unclarity. Unclarity is defined by means of competent, rational, informed speakers (‘CRISPs’) whose competence, etc., is indexed to the scope of the unclarity operator. The unclarity is radical since it eliminates clear cases of unclarity and, that is, clear borderline cases. This radical unclarity leads to a (bivalence-compatible, non-intuitionist) absolute agnosticism about the semantic status of all borderline cases. The corresponding modal system would be a non-normal variation on S4M.
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0010.010
PDF: Link to full PDF [826kb ]

Contents