Whether is Better, the Old or the New? First Paper [pp. 430-432]

The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 4, Issue 5

WHETHER IS BETTER, THE OLD OR THE ANE W? speculations, are b)rought to us now clothed in such modest vestments that hle who runnethl, albeit a simple child, may read and comprehend. Luxury unfolds us like a garment in our social life, just as it has the world thlroLugh all ages. But religion, piety, godliness, while they purpoit to be the same as when the shepherds chanted their jubilant songs over the plains of Bethlehem, and the wise men, guided by the Orient star, presented their offerings of gold, firankincense, and myrrh to the infant Christ: in their outward symbols and manifestations, how intrinsically different, as contrasted with the vorship of eighty or a hundred years gone lby! There are veterans still engaged in a work once deemed an inspiration firom the heavenly and divine, who hold in utter aversion ritualistic lore, and the ceremonies of "book and candle;" men who have always been united in condemning high bonnets, the violin, rumi, tobacco, churchl-bells and steeples." I have sometimes tried to fancy the effect on such old-fashioned ears, as their owner glided with the crowd to the shelter of some vestibule leading to the nave of one of the vast popular temples belonging to the Methodistic army of churches, when the stops of a massive organ wvere, mayhlap, in full diapason, pouring forth strain after strain fi-om some favorite libretto, as an introductory voluntary to the future initiatory piayer. However glorious the hlarmony), lhovever full of sweetest melody the tremulous chords may be, however replete with artistic skill, would not the patriarch cry out with inner voice at least, What doest thlou here, Elijah? While we lhave not seldom asserted in the pages of this magazine that it is a mere croaking cynicism that is alvays piating about the old days being better than the new, and still insist that no grumbler has a right to reprobate present times, and seasons-no right, in fact, to the kingdomn of heaven itself, we yet can not lay blame on those innocent, faithful souls, who mourn over the presence of a cantatrice in holy sanctuary as she wvar bles forth trills and tremulos and runtlets at exolrbitant, often flabulous cost, to the worshipers sitting outside this musical ring-the pit, as it were-who often experience a dumb amaze at anthemns of praise so wondrous, and so mystical. And yet after all our b)lame, we doubt whether indeed this operatic travesty, even lwhen accompanied by a full orchestra of "harp and cymbal and sacblut," be not an advance on those fitful, fugue snatches of hymns to which some wnho see the present day have listened. Those were the days when a chorister deaconed out the first lines-which means, I suppose, lining the verses to be sting, in lieu of books, and adapting the words to the occasion, as was done, we are told, by an excellent and ancient historian, in primitive times, at a certain barn-raising in New England: "'If God to build the house deny, The builder's work is vain; Unless the Lord doth shingle it, It will blow down again." Few of a past generation are there now living who can recall so unique a performance, or who remember the odd scene depicted with such graphic zest by Peter Parley, in his inimitable autobiographly, and whvlich wve venture to excerpt because its repetition can never pall. In his own humorous yet practical way, the venerable man relates the story in this wise: "Before the age of comfortable meeting-houses in country towns, the introduction of stoves into them threatened to overturn society. An adjoining metropolis, Boston, had adopted stoves in the church, and the little townI of E. set about the work of introducing the creation in their ovwn village. So there was a stove party, and the anti-stove party. At the head of the first was Mrs. Deacon R., and at the head of the latter M.rs. Deacon P. "The battle raged portentously, like the renowned tempe'st in a tea-pot. Society wvas lashed into a foam. The minister between the contending factions, scarcely dared say his soul wvas his own. I876.] 43I

/ 98
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 425-434 Image - Page 431 Plain Text - Page 431

About this Item

Title
Whether is Better, the Old or the New? First Paper [pp. 430-432]
Author
Martin, Mrs. E. S.
Canvas
Page 431
Serial
The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 4, Issue 5

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.3-04.005
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acg2248.3-04.005/447:11

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acg2248.3-04.005

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Whether is Better, the Old or the New? First Paper [pp. 430-432]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.3-04.005. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.