Public Lands of Rome and America [pp. 428-431]

Debow's review, Agricultural, commercial, industrial progress and resources. / Volume 24, Issue 5

PUBLIC LANDS OF ROME AND AMERICA. assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them." Earnestly we beg you, then, men of the South, turn out and send full delegations of your nobIest sons to the Convention. JAMES LYONS, of Virginia, T. B. BETHIEA, of Alabama, ,W. M. CHiURCHILL, of Tennessee, B. C. YANCEY, of Georgia, W. W. BOYCE, of South Carolina, Committee. ART. XII.-PUBLIC LANDS OF ROME AN]I AMERICA. THERE is a remarkable similarity in the system of policy adopted by the Romans, in the administration and disposition of their public lands, and that employed by ourselves, for the same purposes. We have unconsciously followed their example, without imitating or copying them. Like circumstances and necessities, acting upon civilized peoples, have produced like effects-showing the identity of human nature in all ages, and that the works of man, like those of bees, ants, and other inferior animals, are the promptings of instinct, or the impulsions of Providence, rather than the results of reasoning. The Roman method of surveying and dividing their lands was almost identical with our own. Under the title "Agrirnensores" in Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, we find the following account of their method: "Thus we find that, in the case of land surveying, the aagur looked to the south; for the gods were supposed to be in the north, and the augur was supposed to be looking in the same manner as the gods looked upon the earth. Hence, the main line in land surveying was drawn from the north to the south, and was called cardo, as corresponding to the axis of the world; the line which it cut was called decumnanus, because it made the figure of a cross, like the numeral X. These two lines were produced to the ex tremity of the ground which was to be laid out, and palallel to them were drawn other lines, according to the size of the quardrangle required, &c." The reference to the numeral X is unfortunate. The lines referred to cut each other at right angles, and all the sections or divisions cf land were rectangular and quadrilateral. I)During the whole term of the Republic, the Romans were vainly endeavoring to prevent the patricians and wealthy plebeians from monopolizing the public lands. Licinius procured a law which prohibited the holding of more than five hundred jtgera (about three hundred and thirty acres) of those lands, by one person. This law was violated, and became Qbsolete, and attempts made to revive it seem to have constituted the only crime of the seditious Gracchi. These lands were gradually monoopolized by the rich and powerful, until, under the Empire, single individuals, even in Italy, owned whole territories. Nominally, the title still remained in the Government, as trutee, for the whole people; but for all practical and profitable purposew, 428


PUBLIC LANDS OF ROME AND AMERICA. assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them." Earnestly we beg you, then, men of the South, turn out and send full delegations of your nobIest sons to the Convention. JAMES LYONS, of Virginia, T. B. BETHIEA, of Alabama, ,W. M. CHiURCHILL, of Tennessee, B. C. YANCEY, of Georgia, W. W. BOYCE, of South Carolina, Committee. ART. XII.-PUBLIC LANDS OF ROME AN]I AMERICA. THERE is a remarkable similarity in the system of policy adopted by the Romans, in the administration and disposition of their public lands, and that employed by ourselves, for the same purposes. We have unconsciously followed their example, without imitating or copying them. Like circumstances and necessities, acting upon civilized peoples, have produced like effects-showing the identity of human nature in all ages, and that the works of man, like those of bees, ants, and other inferior animals, are the promptings of instinct, or the impulsions of Providence, rather than the results of reasoning. The Roman method of surveying and dividing their lands was almost identical with our own. Under the title "Agrirnensores" in Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, we find the following account of their method: "Thus we find that, in the case of land surveying, the aagur looked to the south; for the gods were supposed to be in the north, and the augur was supposed to be looking in the same manner as the gods looked upon the earth. Hence, the main line in land surveying was drawn from the north to the south, and was called cardo, as corresponding to the axis of the world; the line which it cut was called decumnanus, because it made the figure of a cross, like the numeral X. These two lines were produced to the ex tremity of the ground which was to be laid out, and palallel to them were drawn other lines, according to the size of the quardrangle required, &c." The reference to the numeral X is unfortunate. The lines referred to cut each other at right angles, and all the sections or divisions cf land were rectangular and quadrilateral. I)During the whole term of the Republic, the Romans were vainly endeavoring to prevent the patricians and wealthy plebeians from monopolizing the public lands. Licinius procured a law which prohibited the holding of more than five hundred jtgera (about three hundred and thirty acres) of those lands, by one person. This law was violated, and became Qbsolete, and attempts made to revive it seem to have constituted the only crime of the seditious Gracchi. These lands were gradually monoopolized by the rich and powerful, until, under the Empire, single individuals, even in Italy, owned whole territories. Nominally, the title still remained in the Government, as trutee, for the whole people; but for all practical and profitable purposew, 428

/ 126
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 427-436 Image - Page 428 Plain Text - Page 428

About this Item

Title
Public Lands of Rome and America [pp. 428-431]
Author
Fitzhugh, Geo.
Canvas
Page 428
Serial
Debow's review, Agricultural, commercial, industrial progress and resources. / Volume 24, Issue 5

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1336.1-24.005
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acg1336.1-24.005/432:13

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acg1336.1-24.005

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Public Lands of Rome and America [pp. 428-431]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1336.1-24.005. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.