For full access to this item, please  Login

Add to bookbag
Author: Humfrey, John, 1621-1719.
Title: A reply to the defence of Dr. Stillingfleet being a counter plot for union between the Protestants, in opposition to the project of others for conjunction with the Church of Rome / by the authors of the Modest and peaceable inquiry, of the Reflections, (i.e.) the Country confor., of the Peaceable designe.
Publication Info: Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service
2011 April (TCP phase 2)
Availability:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Print source: A reply to the defence of Dr. Stillingfleet being a counter plot for union between the Protestants, in opposition to the project of others for conjunction with the Church of Rome / by the authors of the Modest and peaceable inquiry, of the Reflections, (i.e.) the Country confor., of the Peaceable designe.
Humfrey, John, 1621-1719., Lobb, Stephen, d. 1699.

London: Printed for Thomas Parkhurst ..., 1681.
Notes:
Written by John Humfrey and Stephen Lobb. Cf. Wing.
Pref. signed on p. [22]: Stephen Lobb.
Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.
Subject terms:
Stillingfleet, Edward, -- 1635-1699. -- Unreasonableness of separation.
Christian union -- Controversial literature.
Christian union -- Early works to 1800.
URL: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A45154.0001.001

Contents
title page
To the Right Honourable THE EARL of HALLIFAX.
THE PREFACE.
errata
A Reply to the Defence of Dr. Stil∣lingfleet's Unreasonableness, &c.
CHAP. I. A Reply to the Reflections on the Title of the Enquiry.
SECT. I.
SECT. II.
SECT. III.
CHAP. II. A Reply to what the Deans Substitute suggests in his cen∣suring the Enquirers Design.
CHAP. III. A Reply to the Defence of the Dean of Paul's, so far as it concerns the Modest and Peaceable Enquiry.
SECT. I.
SECT. II.
SECT. III.
letter
letter
Materials for Ʋnion.