For full access to this item, please  Login

Add to bookbag
Author: Humfrey, John, 1621-1719.
Title: A modest and peaceable inquiry into the design and nature of some of those historical mistakes that are found in Dr. Stillingfleet's preface to his Unreasonableness of separation wherein the innocency of Protestant dissenters is cleared up and vindicated from the indecent censures of the doctor / by N. B.
Publication Info: Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service
2011 April (TCP phase 2)
Availability:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Print source: A modest and peaceable inquiry into the design and nature of some of those historical mistakes that are found in Dr. Stillingfleet's preface to his Unreasonableness of separation wherein the innocency of Protestant dissenters is cleared up and vindicated from the indecent censures of the doctor / by N. B.
Humfrey, John, 1621-1719., Lobb, Stephen, d. 1699.

London: Printed for Tho. Parkhurst ..., 1681.
Notes:
By John Humfrey and Stephen Lobb. Cf. Halkett and Laing (2nd ed.)
Reproduction of original in University of Illinois Library.
Subject terms:
Stillingfleet, Edward, -- 1635-1699. -- Unreasonableness of separation.
Dissenters, Religious -- England.
URL: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A45143.0001.001

Contents
title page
To the REVEREND Dr. Stillingfleet.
ERRATA.
A Modest, and Peaceable Inquiry into the Design and Nature of Dr. Stilling fleet's HISTORICAL MISTAKES, &c.
1. The first Argument.
2. Argument.
3. Argument.
Argument 4.
Argument the 5th.
Argument 6.