For full access to this item, please  Login

Add to bookbag
Author: Hewerdine, Thomas, 1659 or 60-1738?
Title: Some plain letters in the defence of infant baptism and of the mode of baptizing (now generally used in the Church of England), which may serve, for a confutation of a small treatise entituled The reason why not infant-sprinkling, but believers-baptism ought to be approved, &c.
Publication Info: Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service
2012 November (TCP phase 2)
Availability:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Print source: Some plain letters in the defence of infant baptism and of the mode of baptizing (now generally used in the Church of England), which may serve, for a confutation of a small treatise entituled The reason why not infant-sprinkling, but believers-baptism ought to be approved, &c.
Hewerdine, Thomas, 1659 or 60-1738?

London: Printed for R. Wilkin ..., 1699.
Notes:
Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.
Preface signed: T. Hewerdine.
Attributed to Thomas Hewerdine. cf. NUC pre-1956.
Subject terms:
Reason why not infant-sprinkling.
Infant baptism -- Early works to 1800.
Baptism -- Early works to 1800.
URL: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43469.0001.001

Contents
title page
TO THE JOINT-PARISHIONERS OF March, Doddington, Wimblington, and Benwick.
letters
LETTER I.
LETTER II.
LETTER III.
LETTER IV.
LETTER V.
LETTER VI.
LETTER VII.
LETTER VIII.
LETTER IX.