|Author:||Spencer, Thomas, fl. 1628-1629.|
|Title:||Maschil vnmasked. In a treatise defending this sentence of our Church: vidz. the present Romish Church hath not the nature of the true Church. Against the publick opposition of Mr. Cholmley, and Mr. Butterfield, two children revolted in opinion from their owne subscription, and the faith of their mother the Church of England. By Thomas Spencer.|
|Publication info:||Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service
2012 November (TCP phase 2)
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at email@example.com for further information or permissions.
Maschil vnmasked. In a treatise defending this sentence of our Church: vidz. the present Romish Church hath not the nature of the true Church. Against the publick opposition of Mr. Cholmley, and Mr. Butterfield, two children revolted in opinion from their owne subscription, and the faith of their mother the Church of England. By Thomas Spencer.
Spencer, Thomas, fl. 1628-1629.
London: Printed by William Iones, dwelling in Red-crosse-streete, 
|Alternate titles:||Maschil unmasked Maschil unmasked.|
A reply to "The state of the now-Romane Church" by Hugh Cholmley and "Maschil" by Robert Butterfield.
Publication date from STC.
Reproduction of the original in the Folger Shakespeare Library.
Cholmley, Hugh, -- ca. 1574-1641. -- State of the now-Romane Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Butterfield, Robert. -- Maschil -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
TO THE COMMONS HOVSE OF PARLIAMENT.
A PREFACE TO THE FOLLOWING DISCOVRSE, answering vnto some points, which concerne the matter in Common.
CHAP. 1. Of the question and parties to the disputation.
CHAP. 2. Of our first Argument for the maine question, and of their generall answer thereunto.
CHAP. 3. Of the same Argument and their answer thereunto.
CHAP. 4. Prooving this sentence, The present Romish faith is erronius.
CHAP. 5. Defendeth this sentence, The Romish faith is erronius.
CHAP. 6. Defendeth this sentence: The faith of the Church is not right and pure, false and erronious together: viz. in different Articles.
CHAP. 7. Containeth a second proofe, that [The Romish faith is false and erronious.]
CHAP. 8. Prooveth this sentence, No Papist, (as a Papist) can be saved.
CHAP. 9. Our Opponent B. his first Argument.
CHAP. 10. Our Opponent B. his second Argument.
CHAP. 11. Of the same Argument new framed.
CHAP. 12. The Romish Church directly denies sal∣vation by Christ.
CHAP. 13. The Romish Church by consequence de∣nies salvation by Christ.
CHAP. 14. They that deny salvation by Christ by conse∣quence are not the true Church.
CHAP. 15. Of the same Opponents third Argument.
CHAP. 16. The fourth Argument for the same purpose.
CHAP. 17. The conclusion of the whole, claiming our Opponents promise.