Capitulum iij.
MOre ouer we may se how euen aȝens cristis wordis in þe gospelle prestis ben þus lordis, wher criste saiþ þus:
"Reges gencium dominantur eorum, vos autem [page 11] non sic"— "þe kyngys of heþen han lordeschip on hem, but ȝe not so." And also aȝens his ensaumple þai ben lordis; for whan he was sowȝte to be made a kynge, & so to take in hym worldly lordeschip, he fledde in-to þe hille and prayde, in toknynge þat siche lordeschip was contrarie to þe state of þe clergi, þat schuld lyue in contemplacyon. But clerkis nowe lyuen not oonly contrariously to þis techynge and ensaumple of criste, but also þai maken stronge lawis reuersynge boþe his wordis and dedis, and letten, in alle þat þai may, hem þat wolde teche þe trouþe of criste. And, by þis lawe þat þai han made, sum of hem han saide þat þai schuld gete owte of þe seculer hondis alle [page 11b] the temporal lordeschip þat þai may, and in no caase delyuer noone aȝen. And þerfore a gentilman axid a greete bischop of þis londe: "In caase þat þe clergy hadde alle þe temporal possescyons, as þai han now þe more parte, how schal þe seculer lordis & knyghtis lyue, & wher-wiþ? siþ god haþ in boþe his lawis alowid her staate and her lijflode." And þen he awnswerid & sayde þat "þai schuld be clerkis soudyoures, and lyue by her wagis." And certis